← Dataset search
SRR11558335
SRAProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
34/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Caudoviricetes
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
76303497
reported
total reads
153517
reported
n content pct
0.031
measured
pct q20 bases
67.8
measured
pct q30 bases
53
measured
gc content pct
65
measured
mean read length
248
measured
mean base quality
27.1
measured
adapter content pct
0.13
measured
duplication rate pct
23.79
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 34/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
53
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
23.79
measured
×0.5
51%
adapter content pct
0.13
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
16 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0