← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Sequel II
Platform
PACBIO_SMRT
Read type
long-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
66492918714
reported
total reads
4060680
reported
mean coverage
24.6
extrapolated
n content pct
0
measured
pct q20 bases
98.8
measured
pct q30 bases
97.1
measured
gc content pct
41.7
measured
mean read length
16340.1
measured
mean base quality
80.1
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
0
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 90/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean coverage
24.6
extrapolated
×1.2
76%
pct q30 bases
97.1
measured
×1
100%
duplication rate pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
6 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0