Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Tribolium castaneum RNA-seq from HiSeq 2000 with 18M reads and exceptionally high quality (97.1% Q20, 95.7% Q30). Although modest depth, the excellent Q30 rate (highest in the Tribolium set) makes this dataset particularly suitable for variant discovery, novel isoform characterization, or quality-sensitive applications in this reference beetle genome.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0