Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR11617506

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

87/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Sycon ciliatum RNA-seq on HiSeq 4000 with 12.3 million 150 bp reads at 97.3% Q20 and 92.8% Q30 across 3.68 Gb provides adequate coverage. The 53.4% GC and good quality support transcript profiling for investigating developmental gene expression in sponges.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Sycon ciliatum
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 4000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 3683800800 reported
total reads 12279336 reported
n content pct 0 measured
pct q20 bases 97.3 measured
pct q30 bases 92.8 measured
gc content pct 53.4 measured
mean read length 150 measured
mean base quality 38.4 measured
adapter content pct 15.76 measured
duplication rate pct 7.65 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 87/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 92.8 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 38.4 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 15.76 measured ×0.4 24%
duplication rate pct 7.65 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 17 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 50