Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR11617514

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Sycon ciliatum bulk-RNA-seq on NovaSeq 6000 with 14.6 million 146.1 bp reads at 98% Q20 and 94.7% Q30 across 4.29 Gb maintains high quality. The 51.7% GC and excellent basecalls support sensitive transcript profiling in sponge molecular biology studies.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Sycon ciliatum
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 4288156046 reported
total reads 14641444 reported
n content pct 0.041 measured
pct q20 bases 98 measured
pct q30 bases 94.7 measured
gc content pct 51.7 measured
mean read length 146.1 measured
mean base quality 36.1 measured
adapter content pct 0.01 measured
duplication rate pct 18.74 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 94.7 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.1 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 18.74 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 10 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 50