Corpus 1,272 assessed · 1,173 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 168 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR11617523

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Sycon ciliatum RNA-seq on NovaSeq 6000 with 20.3 million 146.5 bp reads at 98.1% Q20 and 95% Q30 across 5.95 Gb provides excellent coverage and quality. The 52.4% GC and high basecalls enable sensitive isoform discovery and splicing analysis in sponge transcriptomes.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Sycon ciliatum
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 5949879390 reported
total reads 20275758 reported
n content pct 0.045 measured
pct q20 bases 98.1 measured
pct q30 bases 95 measured
gc content pct 52.4 measured
mean read length 146.5 measured
mean base quality 36.1 measured
adapter content pct 0.01 measured
duplication rate pct 17.85 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.1 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.01 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 17.85 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 50