Corpus 1,273 assessed · 1,174 scored · 643 reproduced ≥75 · 169 flagged ·∅ 74.1/100
← Dataset search

SRR11617528

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

100/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means
claude:haiku

Sycon ciliatum RNA-seq on NovaSeq 6000 with 19.9 million 135 bp reads at 98.5% Q20 and 95.8% Q30 across 5.40 Gb maintains excellent quality despite shorter effective read length. The 53.3% GC and high basecalls support sensitive transcriptome profiling for sponge molecular and developmental biology.

Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Sycon ciliatum
Instrument
Illumina NovaSeq 6000
Platform
ILLUMINA
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok yes reported
total bases 5403077855 reported
total reads 19962871 reported
n content pct 0.051 measured
pct q20 bases 98.5 measured
pct q30 bases 95.8 measured
gc content pct 53.3 measured
mean read length 135 measured
mean base quality 36.3 measured
adapter content pct 0.02 measured
duplication rate pct 19.14 measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 100/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 95.8 measured ×1 100%
mean base quality 36.3 measured ×0.6 100%
adapter content pct 0.02 measured ×0.4 100%
duplication rate pct 19.14 measured ×0.4 100%
QC cost 6 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0

Scientific quality

Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.

1 studies use it mean score 50