Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Zootermopsis nevadensis RNA-seq generated on HiSeq 2000 with 36M 100bp reads and exceptional quality metrics (97.6% Q20, 43.6% GC). Depth supports gene expression profiling and transcript discovery in termite tissues. Strong base quality and low N content (0.003%) make this suitable for de novo assembly or quantification studies seeking termite transcriptome data.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0