Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Zootermopsis nevadensis RNA-seq from HiSeq 2000 yielding 46M 100bp reads with excellent quality (97.7% Q20, 93.6% Q30). Higher read count than SRR1167178 provides increased coverage for expression quantification and isoform detection in termite systems. Minimal contamination (0.002% N) and consistent GC profile (43.7%) support reliable differential expression analysis.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0