Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aedes aegypti HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq yielding 87M reads with moderate quality (87.8% Q20, 80.9% Q30). Substantial depth supports gene expression studies in this medically important mosquito vector. Low N content (0.018%) and standard 45% GC profile are favorable; suitable for quantification workflows where base quality is less critical than coverage.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0