Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aedes aegypti HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq with 113M reads at moderate-to-good quality (89.2% Q20, 81.9% Q30). Substantial depth with reasonable base quality supports expression quantification across mosquito tissues or developmental stages. Low N content (0.016%) indicates clean sequencing; acceptable for standard transcriptomics workflows.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0