Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aedes aegypti HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq with 232M reads at good quality (92% Q20, 86.9% Q30). Ultra-deep sequencing enables high-sensitivity expression quantification and allows detection of lowly-expressed genes or condition-specific isoforms in this disease-vector mosquito. N content (0.741%) is elevated but manageable with standard preprocessing.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0