Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
73/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aedes aegypti RNA-seq on HiSeq 2000 with exceptionally high depth (247M reads, ~25 Gb bases) but moderate quality (88.1% Q20, 80.8% Q30). Extreme coverage depth enables fine-grained expression profiling and rare transcript detection in mosquito tissues despite moderate base quality. N content (0.62%) and lower Q30 suggest filtering may be warranted for sensitive applications.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0