Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aedes aegypti HiSeq 2000 RNA-seq yielding 90M reads with good-to-excellent quality (90.8% Q20, 85% Q30, 47.2% GC). Depth and basecall quality are favorable for transcript quantification and isoform detection in this disease-vector mosquito. Very low N (0.013%) indicates clean library preparation.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0