Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
71/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
HiSeq 4000 bulk RNA-seq from Drosophila mojavensis yields ~33 million short reads (6.59 billion bases, 79.5% Q30), high coverage but with lower Q30 requiring quality filtering. This dataset supports transcript abundance profiling after careful quality control; differential expression studies are feasible. Bulk sequencing lacks cell-type specificity; reuse suits tissue-level or developmental transcriptomic studies of Drosophila.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0