Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
90/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Staphylococcus aureus DAR1370 whole-genome sequencing on HiSeq 2000 with only 54K reads and ~10.8 Mb total bases. This extremely shallow depth (typical bacterial genomes are 4–5 Mb) provides only ~2–3-fold coverage, severely limiting variant calling and assembly accuracy. Useful primarily for rapid taxonomic confirmation or basic presence/absence surveys rather than high-confidence genomic analysis.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0