SRR11678596

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

71/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Drosophila mojavensis RNA-seq from HiSeq 4000 with 29M reads at moderate-to-good quality (88.4% Q20, 78.8% Q30). Comparable depth to SRR11678586 but slightly better Q20; sufficient for expression profiling in this non-model Drosophila species. Low N (0.001%) ensures clean data for comparative transcriptomics relative to melanogaster.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Drosophila mojavensis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 5878768600 reported

total reads 29393843 reported

n content pct 0.001 measured

pct q20 bases 88.4 measured

pct q30 bases 78.8 measured

gc content pct 45.6 measured

mean read length 100 measured

mean base quality 32.7 measured

adapter content pct 0.38 measured

duplication rate pct 13.81 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 71/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 78.8 measured ×1 44%

mean base quality 32.7 measured ×0.6 78%

adapter content pct 0.38 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 13.81 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0