Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This HiSeq 2500 miRNA-seq from Anopheles gambiae produced 12.1M reads spanning 605M bases with 98.1% Q20 and 96.5% Q30, delivering high-confidence small-RNA profiles from this malaria vector. The 49.8% GC is consistent with miRNA libraries. Reuse for miRNA discovery and identifying vector-specific regulatory networks is well-supported; caveat that miRNA expression varies with life stage and feeding history.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0