Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This HiSeq 2500 miRNA-seq from Anopheles gambiae delivered 12.3M reads across 615M bases with 98.2% Q20 and 96.8% Q30, providing high-confidence small-RNA data from this malaria vector. The 52% GC is expected for miRNA-enriched libraries. Reuse for comparative miRNA studies and vector-specific regulatory discovery is well-supported; the consistent quality across replicates suggests reliable quantitative miRNA analysis.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0