Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Culicoides sonorensis (biting midge) RNA-seq from HiSeq 2000 with 42M reads and exceptional quality (99% Q20, 94.3% Q30). Outstanding basecall accuracy—among the highest in the dataset—supports high-confidence isoform and variant analysis in this understudied Culicoides vector. Minimal N (0.001%) ensures clean sequence data for expression or assembly-based studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0