Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
77/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Danaus plexippus (monarch butterfly) RNA-seq from HiSeq 3000 with 163M reads and exceptional quality (98.8% Q20, 96.8% Q30). Exceptional depth and basecall accuracy provide comprehensive transcript coverage for this well-studied lepidopteran model. Zero N content and balanced GC (40.7%) indicate pristine library preparation; ideal for isoform discovery and expression quantification.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0