Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Danaus plexippus (monarch butterfly) RNA-seq from HiSeq 3000 with 16M reads at outstanding quality (98.9% Q20, 96.9% Q30). Moderate depth with exceptional basecall accuracy supports isoform-level transcript quantification in this well-studied lepidopteran. Elevated GC (52.7%) is notable but reasonable for some Danaus tissue or condition.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0