Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This NextSeq 550 RNA-seq from the ant Ooceraea biroi generated 19M reads spanning 2.8B bases with 94.2% Q20 and 88.1% Q30, providing moderate-depth transcriptome data for studying eusocial-behavior gene networks. The 46% GC is typical for hymenopterans. Reuse for social-insect developmental and behavioral transcriptomics is well-suited; caveat that NextSeq read-quality degradation may affect 3'-biased isoform quantitation.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0