Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
High-quality bulk RNA-seq of Tribolium castaneum (100% Q30, 0.001% N) from a HiSeq 4000 with ~12 million reads, complementing SRR11819625. This replicate enables robust expression quantification and variance modeling in a model organism, with flawless data quality supporting isoform quantification and rare-transcript detection.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0