Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Perfect-quality bulk RNA-seq of the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (100% Q30 bases, zero N content) from a HiSeq 4000 with ~15 million reads. This well-characterized model organism dataset supports validation of gene expression predictions and studies of insect development and metamorphosis. Flawless read quality makes it suitable for sensitive downstream analyses and rare-variant detection.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0