Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
97/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Bombyx mori from a HiSeq 2000 with ~7.3 million exceptionally accurate short reads (96.9% Q30), though smaller than typical whole-transcriptome studies. The exceptional base quality makes it suited for rare-variant detection, high-confidence SNP calling, and validation of expression in specific silkworm tissues or developmental stages.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0