Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aedes aegypti RNA-seq on HiSeq 2000 with only 11M reads but exceptional quality (99.4% Q20, 98.3% Q30). Ultra-high basecall accuracy is rare and valuable for isoform-level quantification or novel transcript discovery in this mosquito vector. Limited depth may constrain detection of very lowly-expressed genes, but quality-to-depth trade-off favors sensitive transcript characterization.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0