Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bombus impatiens (bumblebee) RNA-seq from HiSeq 4000 with 27M reads at excellent quality (98.2% Q20, 95.4% Q30). High basecall accuracy and reasonable depth support comprehensive expression profiling and isoform discovery in this important pollinator model. Consistent quality with other Bombus samples (SRR11881331, SRR11881326) enables reliable multi-sample analysis.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0