Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Aedes aegypti RNA-seq from NovaSeq 6000 with 69M reads and exceptional quality (98.6% Q20, 95.9% Q30). Modern instrument and excellent basecall metrics provide powerful resource for comprehensive transcript quantification and rare-isoform discovery in this disease-vector mosquito. Zero N content (within measurement precision) and balanced GC (49%) indicate pristine library quality.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0