Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This HiSeq 1500 WES (whole-exome sequencing) dataset spans 1B bases across 4.1M short reads via targeted capture with 97.9% Q20 and 95.5% Q30, ideal for variant discovery in coding regions of an unnamed organism. The exome enrichment provides deep coverage per target base. Reuse requires knowing the capture kit and organism; caveat that organism identity is missing, limiting interpretation of variant functional impact.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0