Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Apis mellifera (honey bee) RNA-seq from HiSeq 2500 with 22M reads and outstanding quality (98.3% Q20, 94.9% Q30). Clean, deep sequencing on a reliable platform enables comprehensive transcript characterization in this well-studied eusocial insect model. Minimal N (0.001%) and balanced GC (41%) support both expression and isoform studies.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0