← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Saccharum officinarum
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
gc sd
11.94
measured
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
89528332
reported
total reads
3945108
reported
n content pct
0.008
measured
sampled bases
22691620
measured
sampled reads
1000000
measured
gc content pct
50.2
measured
polyg tail pct
0
measured
read length sd
1.3
measured
read length max
24
measured
read length min
21
measured
read length n50
23
measured
max base quality
0
measured
mean read length
22.7
measured
max n pct per pos
0.092
measured
pct reads lt 100bp
100
measured
read length median
23
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
57.51
measured
overrepresented top pct
7.27
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 69/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
57.51
measured
×0.4
39%
QC cost
26 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0