Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Zerene cesonia (California dogface butterfly) RNA-seq from HiSeq X Five with 44M reads at moderate-to-good quality (87.4% Q20, 82.8% Q30). Solid depth on a high-capacity platform supports expression profiling in this understudied lepidopteran species. Slightly elevated N (0.239%) and moderate Q30 suggest filtering before sensitive downstream analyses.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0