Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Microvelia longipes (water strider) RNA-seq from HiSeq 4000 with 50M reads and excellent quality (95.9% Q20, 89.8% Q30). Solid depth and basecall metrics support reliable transcript quantification in this understudied hemipteran insect. Low N (0.002%) and stable GC (37.9%) across the Microvelia samples indicate consistent library quality.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0