Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
NextSeq 500 bulk RNA-seq of the wax moth Galleria mellonella with ~19 million reads and moderate quality (86.4% Q30). As a widely used model for insect innate immunity and pathogen research, the dataset supports immune-challenge studies and infection-response gene expression profiling. Note the slightly lower Q30 percentage relative to HiSeq platforms in this collection.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0