Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
95/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Locusta migratoria (desert locust) RNA-seq from NovaSeq 6000 with 20M reads and outstanding quality (97.7% Q20, 93.4% Q30). Modern high-throughput platform delivers clean data despite modest read count; high basecall quality compensates and enables sensitive transcript-level analysis in this pest-relevant orthopteran species. Balanced GC (48%) and zero N support transcript discovery.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0