Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
SARS-CoV-2 amplicon sequencing; reference-grade quality (grade A, 100/100). Negligible adapter contamination (0.98%) combined with solid Q30 content (92.3%) and excellent mean base quality (35.7) create an exceptionally clean dataset suitable for high-confidence variant discovery. The very high duplication rate (98.05%) is a technical artifact of amplification but does not compromise underlying sequence integrity.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0