Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This NovaSeq 6000 amplicon run for SARS-CoV-2 generated 5.5 million short reads (2.75 billion bases)—one of the largest in this amplicon cohort—with good Q20 (97.3%) but lower Q30 (92.1%), suggesting possible library complexity variation or sequencer performance fluctuation. The high read count compensates, permitting deep per-amplicon coverage and extensive sample multiplexing for large surveillance programs.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0