Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
94/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
High-quality bulk RNA-seq of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera from a HiSeq 4000 with ~6.2 million reads (97.6% Q30). This agricultural pest's transcriptome supports studies of pesticide resistance mechanisms, reproductive biology, and host-plant adaptation. Valuable for crop protection research and understanding insect-plant interactions.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0