Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
96/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This HiSeq 4000 RNA-seq from the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera provides 1.2B bases across 6.3M reads with 99.2% Q20 and 97.5% Q30, supporting comprehensive transcriptome profiling and gene expression quantitation. The high per-base accuracy is ideal for splice-site identification and transcript reconstruction. Reuse for expression studies is straightforward; note that results reflect the specific tissue/condition sampled in the original experiment.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0