Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-Seq from beetle (Illumina HiSeq 2500). Grade A/100—excellent base quality (94% Q30, 37.8 mean BQ) combined with minimal adapter (2.25%, scored 99/100) and low duplication (27.51%) across 150bp reads. Strong metrics across all dimensions support reliable comprehensive transcriptomic profiling.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0