SRR1237957

ENA first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

insufficient data to score

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained

Data type / assay

methylation

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 1000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 16330286202 reported

total reads 80843001 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 91.9 measured

pct q30 bases 82.4 measured

gc content pct 57.5 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 33 measured

adapter content pct 0.01 measured

duplication rate pct 18.08 measured

How this grade was computed

The insufficient grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published methylation thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 82.4 measured ×1 62%

QC cost 27 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0