SRR1239719

SRA

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

No linked papers found in the corpus yet.

Deep data QC

53/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Oryza sativa

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1107212427 reported

total reads 6151403 reported

mean coverage 2.6 extrapolated

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 93.4 measured

pct q30 bases 85.5 measured

gc content pct 40.2 measured

mean read length 90 measured

mean base quality 33.9 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 9.42 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 53/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 2.6 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 85.5 measured ×1 78%

duplication rate pct 9.42 measured ×0.5 96%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 26 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0