Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
miRNA-seq (Illumina HiSeq 4000). B-grade QC (83/100, fully measured); exceptional base quality (pct_q30=99.3%, mean_base_quality=40) scored 100/100, but extreme 83.93% duplication (scored 0/100) indicates nearly all reads are PCR clones—unsuitable for discovery. Usable only for abundant, previously-identified miRNAs.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0