SRR12496121

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

67/100 · D

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

miRNA-Seq with nearly identical QC profile to SRR12496118: duplication_rate_pct=84.46 (measured, score 0/100) alongside perfect base quality (Q30/Q20=100%, mean Q=30, measured) in 22.7bp reads. Extreme duplication from intrinsic miRNA complexity combined with PCR amplification makes quantitative reuse infeasible without specialized collapse methods. Not recommended.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Bactrocera dorsalis

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2500

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 795093469 reported

total reads 35194232 reported

n content pct 0.016 measured

pct q20 bases 100 measured

pct q30 bases 100 measured

gc content pct 45.5 measured

mean read length 22.7 measured

mean base quality 30 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 84.46 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 67/100

The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 100 measured ×1 100%

mean base quality 30 measured ×0.6 33%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 84.46 measured ×0.4 0%

QC cost 58 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0