Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
84/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
miRNA-seq (BGISEQ-500). B-grade QC (84/100, fully measured); good base quality (pct_q30=92.5%) and expected 22.3 bp short reads indicate proper small RNA capture, but 72.89% duplication (scored 5/100) critically reduces diversity—expected for miRNA but limits quantitation. Usable for relative studies only; deduplication essential.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0