SRR1252006

ENA first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Plant WGS (Illumina HiSeq 2000). C-grade QC; excellent base quality (pct_q30=98.8%) contrasts sharply with severe 66.46% duplication rate (scored 0/100), indicating shallow sequencing or PCR bias. Marginal for reuse; duplicate rate limits effective genome coverage for assembly.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Panax ginseng

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 553017824 reported

total reads 2737712 reported

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 99.9 measured

pct q30 bases 98.8 measured

gc content pct 40.6 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 37.8 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 66.46 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 98.8 measured ×1 100%

duplication rate pct 66.46 measured ×0.5 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 29 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0