Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This HiSeq 2000 WGS from the medicinal plant Panax ginseng produced 1.7M reads spanning 380M bases with 99.8% Q20 and 97.6% Q30, providing shallow whole-genome coverage suitable for SNP discovery and population genetics. The 34.2% GC is lower than typical animals, reflecting plant genome composition. Reuse for phylogeography and germplasm characterization is straightforward; caveat that shallow coverage limits structural-variant detection.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0