SRR12572618

SRA first seen 2021

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

93/100 · A

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Bulk RNA-Seq (Illumina HiSeq 4000). Grade A/93—solid execution with extended read length (79.5bp). Mean base quality (33.3, scored 88/100) and duplication rate (35.22%, scored 88/100) are the slight constraints; Q30 composition (88.9%) acceptable for standard expression analysis. Dataset suitable for comparative transcriptomics.

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Epargyreus clarus

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 4000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

1 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2740573539 reported

total reads 34463914 reported

n content pct 0.003 measured

pct q20 bases 92.5 measured

pct q30 bases 88.9 measured

gc content pct 43.8 measured

mean read length 79.5 measured

mean base quality 33.3 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 35.22 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 93/100

The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 88.9 measured ×1 95%

mean base quality 33.3 measured ×0.6 88%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 35.22 measured ×0.4 88%

QC cost 55 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0