Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
91/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Epargyreus clarus bulk RNA-Seq from HiSeq 4000 with large-scale sequencing (33M reads, 9.3B bases) at good quality (92.3% ≥Q20, 87.3% ≥Q30). Comprehensive butterfly transcriptomics dataset supporting gene expression studies in lepidopterans.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0